The Wooleys expanded business and the menu to include pizza, and eventually took the company public in 1995 under the stock market name BUNZ. Franchisor Details Schlotzsky’s Bakery/cafe is a pioneer in the fast casual restaurant franchise category. Offering great food at an affordable price in a quirky, unique and fun bakery/cafe setting, Schlotzsky’s has created a passionate customer following throughout the United States. The brand reimage was completed in 2011, the same year Schlotzsky’s celebrated its 40th birthday with a national $1.99 small The Original® special.

Competition in the market was improved by the exercise of Schlotzsky’s contract power in its small part of the relevant market. Sterling presented no evidence that market power was at work. The district court granted judgment as a matter of law on Sterling’s antitrust claims. Sterling argues the judgment was error because when Schlotzsky’s required franchisees to enter into the participation agreements, an illegal tying arrangement was created under the Sherman Act. In March 2005, Schlotzsky’s filed suit against Sterling in federal court in the Western District of Texas. In March 2006, a jury found that Sterling willfully committed false designation of affiliation, sponsorship, or approval with respect to Schlotzsky’s commercial activities.

What it lacked in vowels, it made up for in staying power as it stuck with the brand through nearly a half-century of growth and challenges. Julie Walker said “the Original” is still one of the most popular items at the Beaumont store. Inside, the Beaumont location has a mixture of neon and LED lights with rustic colors and decor, but it also features murals of local landmarks like the Jefferson County Courthouse and Spindletop. All the information on this website – – is published in good faith and for general information purpose only.

Once you know how a single letter should sound, pronouncing a full name becomes much easier. A separate issue is raised of whether Sterling ever presented evidence by which lost profits could be measured. Because of our finding that there was no evidence to support the other elements of the tort, we need not address damages. Schlotzsky’s and its franchisees had the right to enter into these contracts; and therefore, the conduct of Schlotzsky’s was certainly reasonable under the circumstances. The district court did not err in awarding injunctive relief without finding a precise measure of monetary damages.

The first Schlotzsky’s opened in 1971 on Austin’s South Congress Avenue by Don and Dolores Dissman. When it first opened, it only served a muffuletta-inspired sandwich of several meats, cheeses and olives all on a fresh baked bun. Sliders and macaroni and cheese are two of the biggest additions to the menu.

The Walkers said they bought into the franchise around 2008 because of the brand’s appeal and its Texas roots. Now that it is changing to reflect those origins, they said they’re even more excited for what the future of their restaurants will look like. Schlotzsky’s is known as a pretty standard sandwich chain with more than 350 locations around the world. But, like so many other standard restaurant orplex chains these days, the company appears to be making a big move in hopes of luring the coveted millennial demographic. In 2016, Schlotzsky’s introduced a new restaurant chain called Schlotzsky’s Austin Eatery, which targets Millennials with a menu featuring Austin -inspired food from the city. The first location opened in Duluth, Georgia; other locations followed in a slow expansion.

In addition, the non-exclusive and revocable nature of Schlotzsky’s authorization with Sterling allowed Schlotzsky’s to pursue its own financial interests, even if unfavorable to Sterling. What Sterling lost when the franchisees turned to SYGMA and COI was its interests under revocable agreements with the franchisees. There was not any threat or commission of an act that was beyond Schlotzsky’s legal rights.